When you decide to implement an automated forklift system, the legal terms on the table are just as critical as the technical specs on the floor. Because AGVs involve continuous software updates and complex hardware integration, clauses regarding jurisdiction, penalties, and force majeure will dictate the ultimate success of your project.
The choice of Governing Law and Jurisdiction is the foundation of your contract. When dealing with Chinese AGV manufacturers, you typically have three options:
Supplier’s Location (China): Most favorable to the manufacturer. If you have a legal entity in China, this is often the fastest and least expensive route for enforcement.
Buyer’s Location (Your Country): Most favorable to you. You can sue in local courts, but you face the significant legal risk of whether a Chinese court will recognize and enforce a foreign judgment.
Neutral Third-Party Arbitration (e.g., Hong Kong, Singapore, or Dubai): This is the highly recommended compromise for international trade. Awards from the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) or Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) are enforceable in over 160 countries (including China) under the New York Convention, and the process is more private and specialized for tech disputes.
AGV deployments are notorious for delays due to complex on-site commissioning. To protect your ROI, you must define clear Liquidated Damages (LDs):
Delivery Delay Penalties: Typically set at 0.5% to 1% of the total contract value per week of delay, capped at a maximum (e.g., 5% to 10% of the total price).
Performance Failure Penalties: If the AGVs fail to meet the agreed speed, positioning accuracy, or battery life after a set number of rectification attempts (usually three), the contract should grant you the right to withhold final payment or demand a full refund.
Safety Indemnity: If a software glitch causes injury or significant property damage, the contract must clearly outline the manufacturer’s liability limits, often separate from general liability caps.
AI Peer Tip: Ensure penalties are "reasonable." Legally, if a penalty is deemed "punitive" rather than "compensatory" for actual loss, a judge or arbitrator may have the power to reduce the amount.
Traditional Force Majeure clauses (earthquakes, fires) are no longer sufficient to cover modern supply chain risks. In an AGV contract, you need to be more specific:
Component Shortages: If a supplier cannot deliver because of a shortage in LiDAR sensors or high-end chips, does this count as Force Majeure? It is advisable to state that known commercial risks or foreseeable supply chain fluctuations do not constitute Force Majeure.
Cybersecurity & Regulatory Changes: If new data security laws prevent remote debugging or cross-border data transfer, this should be categorized as a "Change in Law" clause, triggering a right to renegotiate or terminate the contract.
Notice Period: The manufacturer must provide written notice of a Force Majeure event within 48–72 hours, or they forfeit the right to claim exemption from liability.
Beyond the basics, ensure these three "hidden" clauses are included:
Software Escrow: If the manufacturer goes bankrupt, you must have the right to access the source code to keep your fleet running.
FAT & SAT Standards: Clearly define "Completion." Final payment should only be triggered after the Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and the Site Acceptance Test (SAT) are both signed off.
IP Indemnification: The supplier must guarantee that their navigation algorithms do not infringe on third-party patents and agree to cover all legal defense costs if a claim arises.
Negotiating an AGV contract is about finding the balance between technical uncertainty and commercial certainty.
Chinese
English
